Computational Thinking in Primary School: An Examination of Abstraction and Decom-position in Different Age Groups
Computational Thinking in Primary School: An Examination of Abstraction and Decom-position in Different Age Groups
复制标题
小学计算思维：不同年龄段抽象与分解的考察
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Tolboom
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wouter J. Rijke;L. Bollen;Tessa H. S. Eysink;J. Tolboom
计算思维描述了以计算机可以执行的方式制定问题及其解决方案的思维过程。尽管越来越多的努力在小学实施计算思维技能，但很少有关于在什么年龄教授什么技能的研究。这对于从事初等教育的教师来说是一个问题，他们希望教授计算思维技能。本研究的研究问题如下：（1）年龄如何影响学生在计算思维相关任务中的成功？(2)学生认为计算思维课程有多难？(3)学生对自己的学习经历有什么看法？210名6至12岁的小学生参加了这项研究。从赤脚计算项目的经验教训被用来作为两个计算思维主题的介绍：抽象和分解。第一个主要发现涉及年龄和所讨论的计算思维技能之间的关系;抽象和分解。第二，性别和抽象任务之间存在交互作用。第三，对于这两个任务，没有显着差异的年龄组之间的感知难度，认知负荷，和流量。对未来研究的意义和方向进行了讨论。
Computational thinking describes the thought process of formulating problems and their solutions in a way that can be carried out by a computer. Despite a growing effort to implement computational thinking skills in primary schools, little research has been conducted about what skills to teach at what age. This is a problem for teachers working in primary education, wanting to teach computational thinking skills. The research questions that guide this study are as follows: (1) How is age influencing the students’ success in tasks related to computational thinking? (2) How difficult are lessons about computational thinking perceived by students? (3) What are the students’ perceptions of their learning experiences? 210 primary school students between the age of 6 and 12 participated in this study. Lessons from the Barefoot Computing project are used as an introduction into two computational thinking subjects: abstraction and decomposition. The first main finding concerns the relation between age and the discussed computational thinking skills; abstraction and decomposition. Second, an interaction is found between gender and the abstraction task. Third, for both tasks, there are no significant differences between age groups on perceived difficulty, cognitive load, and flow. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
影响因子：
6.6
作者：
Wang, Ming-Te;Degol, Jessica
通讯作者：
Degol, Jessica