Soil-Water Threshold Range of Chemical Signals and Drought Tolerance Was Mediated by ROS Homeostasis in Winter Wheat During Progressive Soil Drying
Soil-Water Threshold Range of Chemical Signals and Drought Tolerance Was Mediated by ROS Homeostasis in Winter Wheat During Progressive Soil Drying
复制标题
土壤渐进干燥过程中冬小麦化学信号和耐旱性的土壤-水阈值范围是由活性氧稳态介导的
DOI:
10.1007/s00344-008-9057-4
复制
发表时间:
2008-08
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Wang, Zhen-Yu
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xiong, You-Cai;Xu, Bing-Cheng;Li, Feng-Min;Wang, Zhen-Yu
The soil-water threshold range of chemical signals and reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis could have a profound impact on drought tolerance in wheat. A pot experiment was used to investigate the homeostasis between ROS and antioxidant defense at five harvest dates, and its role in the correlation between soil-water threshold range of chemical signals and drought tolerance in three wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars during progressive soil drying. The cultivars were bred at different periods, cv. BM1 (old), cv. Xiaoyan6 (recent), and cv. Shan229 (modern). They were treated with progressive soil drying. Shoot biomass was affected by drought imposed by two water treatments (90% and 55% field water capacity). The modern wheat cultivar had a lower ROS content and higher ROS-scavenging antioxidant capacity with greater soil drying (68–25% soil water content) compared with the older cultivar. The modern cultivar also had excellent adaptation to drought, with a longer survival of 22.7 days and less reduction in shoot biomass of 20.9% due to early chemical signals and better balance between ROS production and antioxidants. The older cultivar had survival of 15.3 days and 37.3% reduction of shoot biomass. A wider soil-water threshold range of chemical signals was positively correlated with improved drought tolerance and better ROS homeostasis. These results suggest that ROS homeostasis acts as a regulator in relationships between the soil-water threshold range of chemical signals and drought tolerance.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6.9
作者:
S. Palmer;D. Berridge;A. McDonald;W. Davies
通讯作者:
S. Palmer;D. Berridge;A. McDonald;W. Davies
DOI:
10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01856.x
发表时间:
1996-03
期刊:
The New phytologist
影响因子:
--
作者:
Jingxian Zhang;M. Kirkham
通讯作者:
Jingxian Zhang;M. Kirkham
影响因子:
7.4
作者:
McKersie, BD;Murnaghan, J;Bowley, SR
通讯作者:
Bowley, SR
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
Y. Xiong;Fengmin Li;Ting Zhang
通讯作者:
Y. Xiong;Fengmin Li;Ting Zhang
影响因子:
6.9
作者:
Ober, ES;Sharp, RE
通讯作者:
Sharp, RE