On the cusp: Epidemiology and bacteriology at the local government board, 1890-1905
On the cusp: Epidemiology and bacteriology at the local government board, 1890-1905
复制标题
DOI:
10.1017/s0025727300064012
复制
发表时间:
1998-07-01
期刊:
影响因子:
1.4
通讯作者:
Hardy, A
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hardy, A
There is a well-established tradition in the history of epidemiology that, after a promising start with the foundation of the London Epidemiological Society in 1850 and the work of John Snow and William Budd, the discipline suffered an eclipse with the coming of bacteriology." Beginning in 1870 and until 1910", wrote David Lilienfeld in 1979," the Bacteriological Era overshadowed epidemiology. During these 40 years epidemiology hibernated... 9". 1 It is a view which still holds good, and which is taken from the standpoint of the development of concepts and methods in the discipline, and depends on the tradition that with thediscovery of bacteria epidemiology vanished in the pursuit of the specific agents of disease. 2 Both these criteria are flawed: the first represents an overly theoretical approach to the discipline which ignores the reality ofa long and honourable practice of field epidemiology between 1870 and 1914; the second has complex historical roots, which bear little relation, in England and Wales at least, to the continuing vitality of epidemiological investigation in this period. 3 By the last decade of the century, indeed, practitioners of epidemiology had begun to perceive bacteriology as a threat to their own discipline and, by extension, to preventive medicine. This particular disciplinary anxiety can be detected between 1894 and 1906, between Emil Roux's announcement of the anti-toxintherapy for diphtheria in the summer of 1894, and Klinger's demonstration of the existence of the healthy typhoid carrier in 1906. Scattered references in the contemporary literature testify to the growing unease of the epidemiological community in the years after 1894. Itwas perhaps articulated most clearly by an anonymous contributor to theJournal ofState Medicine in 1896, who began by deploring the dullness of epidemiology when compared to the" joys of modern science"-the" manipulation of bacilli, the extraction of toxines and their antidotes, with