(Un)troubling identity politics: A cultural materialist intervention

(Un)troubling identity politics: A cultural materialist intervention
复制标题

(不)令人不安的身份政治:文化唯物主义干预

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Marie Moran
Marie Moran
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Marie Moran

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文借鉴雷蒙德·威廉姆斯阐述的文化唯物主义范式,对身份观念进行了彻底的历史化,旨在澄清和解决目前左翼学术界和激进主义之间引发“身份政治”辩论的一些问题。首先,它澄清了“身份政治”的概念,表明我们应该保留该术语,仅指围绕身份概念具体而有意义地动员起来的政治。其次,正因为如此,它为推动身份政治辩论的五个核心问题提供了新的见解:身份政治是否总是倾向于本质主义?身份政治是否不可避免地会促进承认政治而非再分配?身份政治是否不可避免地会造成政治分裂,而不是政治行动的团结形式? “身份政治”和“呼唤文化”之间有什么关系?而且,身份政治的问题是否可以通过交叉性来解决?
This article draws on the cultural materialist paradigm articulated by Raymond Williams to offer a radical historicization of the idea of identity, with a view to clarifying and resolving some of the issues animating the ‘identity politics’ debates currently dividing left academia and activism. First, it offers clarity on the concept ‘identity politics’, demonstrating that we should reserve the term to refer only to politics that mobilize specifically and meaningfully around the concept of identity. Second, and in virtue of this, it provides new insights into five central questions that have driven the identity politics debates: Do identity politics always tend towards essentialism?; Do identity politics inevitably promote a politics of recognition over redistribution?; Do identity politics inevitably create political cleavages rather than solidaristic forms of political action?; What is the relationship between ‘identity politics’ and ‘call-out culture’?; And, are the problems of identity politics resolved by reference to intersectionality?
DOI: 10.1163/1569206x-00001776
发表时间: 2018
期刊: Historical Materialism
影响因子: --
作者:
Kumar A
通讯作者: Kumar A