:The Excavations at Tell al Rimah: The Pottery
:The Excavations at Tell al Rimah: The Pottery
复制标题
:Tell al Rimah 的发掘：陶器
DOI：
10.1086/429172
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
J. Ur
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Ur
I Esdras：文本批评评论。作者：齐波拉·塔尔希尔。圣经文学协会，七十士译本和同源研究系列，编号。 50. 亚特兰大：圣经文学协会，2001 年。 xiv+ 556。67.95 美元。在这本书中，塔尔希尔以她之前对《第一埃斯德拉斯》《第一埃斯德拉斯：从起源到翻译》（亚特兰大，1999 年）的全面介绍为基础，并兑现了书名所承诺的内容：对这部杜撰作品中的每一节经文进行文本批判性评论。 First Esdras 包含 2 Chron 的希腊语翻译。 35-36、以斯拉记 1-10 章和尼希记。 8：1-13，以及3：1-5：6中的青年故事，其闪族原著已不复存在。在 1:21-22 处还有两节没有规范平行的经文。对于 1 Esdras 中具有规范平行的部分，Talshir 打印了马所拉文本的辅音和取自罗伯特·汉哈特 (Robert Hanhart) 编辑并于 1974 年出版的《哥廷根七十士译本》的希腊语翻译。MT 中添加了一组简单的 sigla 指示优点和缺点、更改的词序等。单个希伯来语或阿拉姆语单词后面的数字是随后的文本批评评论的关键。重建希伯来语原版 1:21-22。她认为这些补充诗句不可能最初是用希腊语写的，也不可能是编年史家写的，因为它们与他的想法相冲突。
I Esdras: A Text Critical Commentary. By Zipora Talshir. Society of Biblical Literature, Septuagint and Cognate Studies Series, no. 50. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2001. Pp. xiv+ 556. $67.95. In this volume, Talshir builds on her earlier comprehensive introduction to First Esrdas, I Esdras: From Origin to Translation (Atlanta, 1999) and delivers on what the book title promises: a text-critical commentary on every verse in this apocryphal writing. First Esdras consists of a Greek translation of 2 Chron. 35–36, Ezra 1–10, and Neh. 8: 1–13, and the Story of the Youths in 3: 1–5: 6, whose Semitic original is no longer extant. There are also two verses without canonical parallel at 1: 21–22.For the parts of 1 Esdras having canonical parallels, Talshir prints out the consonants of the Masoretic Text and the Greek translation taken from the Göttingen Septuagint as edited by Robert Hanhart and published in 1974. A simple set of sigla indicating pluses and minuses, changed word order and the like are added to the MT. Raised numbers after individual Hebrew or Aramaic words are keyed to the subsequent text-critical commentary. A Hebrew Vorlage for 1: 21–22 is reconstructed. She maintains that these supplementary verses could not have been written originally in Greek, nor could they have been written by the Chronicler, since they conflict with his ideas.