Ideal efficiency analysis and comparison of condensing and liquid desiccant dehumidification
Ideal efficiency analysis and comparison of condensing and liquid desiccant dehumidification
复制标题
冷凝与液体除湿理想效率分析比较
DOI:
10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.012
复制
发表时间:
2012-06
影响因子:
6.7
通讯作者:
Yi Jiang
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lun Zhang;Xiaohua Liu;Yi Jiang
In this paper, ideal dehumidification process is achieved by both condensing dehumidification and liquid desiccant dehumidification methods, and the minimum input work and ideal COP of the two dehumidification methods are derived. For liquid desiccant dehumidification, the humidity ratio of regeneration air is the most important influencing factor of COP. For condensing dehumidification, the temperature of heat sink is the most important influencing factor of COP. The essence of dehumidification is transportation of moisture between indoor and outdoor two different humidity ratios. Exhaust heat into heat sink in condensing dehumidification method and exhaust moisture into moisture sink in liquid desiccant dehumidification mode can be compared, due to the fact that heat and moisture are unified in saturated line. The two dehumidification modes will have the same performance, when heat sink of condensing dehumidification is dew point of outdoor air by indirect evaporation or outdoor air is saturated. Otherwise, the ideal COP of condensing dehumidification will be lower than liquid desiccant dehumidification process.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6.4
作者:
S. Jain;P. Dhar;S. Kaushik
通讯作者:
S. Jain;P. Dhar;S. Kaushik
影响因子:
7.4
作者:
Cheng-qin Ren;Nianping Li;Guangfa Tang
通讯作者:
Cheng-qin Ren;Nianping Li;Guangfa Tang
影响因子:
11.2
作者:
Peng, Donggen;Zhang, Xiaosong
通讯作者:
Zhang, Xiaosong
影响因子:
11.2
作者:
Desideri, Umberto;Proietti, Stefania;Sdringola, Paolo
通讯作者:
Sdringola, Paolo
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
B. A. Qureshi;S. Zubair
通讯作者:
B. A. Qureshi;S. Zubair