The Stroop Color and Word Test.

The Stroop Color and Word Test.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00557
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Tagini S
Tagini S
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Scarpina F;Tagini S

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

Stroop颜色和单词测试(SCWT)是一种神经心理学测试,广泛用于评估抑制认知干扰的能力,这种干扰发生在特定刺激特征的处理阻碍第二刺激属性的同时处理时,即众所周知的Stroop效应。本工作的目的是验证用于测量Stroop效应的各种评分方法的理论充分性。我们提出了一个系统的审查研究提供了规范性数据的SCWT。我们参考了两个电子数据库(即,PubMed、Scopus、Google Scholar)和引文。我们的研究结果表明,虽然有几种评分方法已在文献中报道,没有一个审查的方法,使我们能够充分评估Stroop效应。此外,我们讨论了几个规范的评分方法,从意大利全景文献报道。我们要求一种替代评分方法,该方法同时考虑响应的速度和准确性。最后,我们强调了在所有Stroop测试条件下(单词阅读、颜色命名、命名颜色词)评估表现的重要性。
The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) is a neuropsychological test extensively used to assess the ability to inhibit cognitive interference that occurs when the processing of a specific stimulus feature impedes the simultaneous processing of a second stimulus attribute, well-known as the Stroop Effect. The aim of the present work is to verify the theoretical adequacy of the various scoring methods used to measure the Stroop effect. We present a systematic review of studies that have provided normative data for the SCWT. We referred to both electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar) and citations. Our findings show that while several scoring methods have been reported in literature, none of the reviewed methods enables us to fully assess the Stroop effect. Furthermore, we discuss several normative scoring methods from the Italian panorama as reported in literature. We claim for an alternative scoring method which takes into consideration both speed and accuracy of the response. Finally, we underline the importance of assessing the performance in all Stroop Test conditions (word reading, color naming, named color-word).