The Ultimate Faculty Evaluation: Promotion and Tenure Decisions
The Ultimate Faculty Evaluation: Promotion and Tenure Decisions
复制标题
最终的教师评估：晋升和终身教职决定
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Fairweather
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Fairweather
在本章中，我从密歇根州立大学教育学院大学续聘、晋升和终身教职委员会（RPT）前任主席和现任成员的角度出发，根据这一经验和许多其他经验，（见费尔韦瑟，1996年），我的结论是，在我们学院的教师得出推论，他们的institution，学院，与学院或机构选择的衡量绩效和设定RPT标准的方式相比，学院和部门更看重晋升和终身职位决定（有时是工资和加薪）的结果。正如胡贝尔在第七章中所指出的，“
In this chapter I take the perspective of the former chair and current mem-ber of the College Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure Committee(RPT) in the College of Education at Michigan State University (MSU).Based on this experience and many others (see Fairweather, 1996), I con-clude that the faculty in our college draw inferences about what their insti-tution, college, and department value the most by viewing the outcome ofpromotion and tenure decisions (and sometimes salaries and raises) morethan by the ways that a college or institution chooses to measure perfor-mance and set RPT criteria. As Huber notes in Chapter Seven, “