Individual differences in hedonic experience: Further evidence for the construct validity of the ACIPS
Individual differences in hedonic experience: Further evidence for the construct validity of the ACIPS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.061
复制
发表时间：
2015-09-30
影响因子：
11.3
通讯作者：
Burgin, Chris J.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gooding, Diane C.;Winston, Tina M.;Burgin, Chris J.
我们进行了三项调查，以检查预期和消费性人际愉悦量表（ACIPS; Gooding和Pflum，精神病学研究，2014）的收敛和判别效度。在第一项研究中，我们使用Mechanical Turk对25-69岁的社区成年人进行单独管理ACIPS。报告更大的社会/人际关系的快乐与更大的人际关系与他人的联系感，更高的归属感，以及在社会交往中报告焦虑的可能性较小。在研究二和三中，参与者在小组环境中进行测试。对大学生参与者的研究表明，ACIPS分数与亲社会互动和社交能力以及快感缺乏的措施有关。尽管测试条件不同（即，在线与纸质管理）和样本在教育水平，地理位置和年龄方面的异质性，ACIPS表现出良好的收敛效度和判别效度。总之，这些研究为ACIPS的结构效度提供了越来越多的证据。(C)2015爱思唯尔爱尔兰有限公司版权所有。
We conducted three investigations to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale (ACIPS; Gooding and Pflum, Psychiatry Research, 2014). In Study One, we used Mechanical Turk to individually administer the ACIPS to a diverse group of community adults aged 25-69. Reports of greater social/interpersonal pleasure was associated with greater sense of interpersonal connectedness with others, higher need to belong, and less likelihood of reporting anxiety during social interactions. In Studies Two and Three, participants were tested in group settings. Studies with undergraduate participants indicated that ACIPS scores are associated with measures of prosocial interactions and sociability as well as measures of anhedonia. Despite differences in testing conditions (i.e., online vs. paper administration) and heterogeneity in the samples in terms of educational level, geographical location, and age, the ACIPS demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. Taken together, these studies add to the increasing body of evidence for the construct validity of the ACIPS. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.