Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stocks differ among vegetation patch types in a degraded alpine steppe
Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stocks differ among vegetation patch types in a degraded alpine steppe
复制标题
退化高山草原中不同植被斑块类型的碳、氮和磷储量存在差异
DOI:
10.1007/s11368-018-2191-0
复制
发表时间:
2018-11
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Cai Yanjiang
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yan Yan;Tian Linlin;Du Ziyin;Chang Scott X.;Cai Yanjiang
PurposeDegradation of grassland creates diverse vegetation patch types with plant species with different palatabilities, potentially affecting ecosystem productivity and soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration. This study investigated variations in SOC densities and carbon/nitrogen/phosphorus (C/N/P) ratios among vegetation patch types in a degraded alpine steppe on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Materials and methodsWe examined soil, shoot and root C, N and P densities, and C/N/P ratios in a growing season for five vegetation patch types dominated by palatable plant speciesStipa purpurea,S. purpureaandPoa litwinowiana, and unpalatable plant speciesLeontopodium nanum,Artemisia nanschanica, andOxytropis glacialis.Results and discussionSoil C and N as well as shoot and root densities varied among patch types, but not soil C/N. Patches dominated by unpalatable plant species had a lower SOC density, lower soil and plant N/P ratios, and greater plant nutrient densities than those dominated by palatable plant species. Vegetation patch type strongly influenced nutrient densities and ratios in soil-plant systems, and sampling only areas dominated by palatable plant species may overestimate the C sequestration rate at the ecosystem scale.ConclusionsEven though patch-level plant biomass and nutrient density may increase with increasing degradation, the decrease in palatability and SOC storage at the ecosystem scale would impair grassland sustainability as alpine grassland degradation proceeds. The palatability of plants should thus be considered for improving regional SOC stock estimate in future research.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
--
作者:
Xuyang Lu;Jihui Fan;Yan Yan;Xiaodan Wang
通讯作者:
Xiaodan Wang
影响因子:
9.4
作者:
Bell, Colin;Carrillo, Yolima;Wallenstein, Matthew D.
通讯作者:
Wallenstein, Matthew D.
影响因子:
1.7
作者:
Li, Yuan-Yuan;Dong, Shi-Kui;Wu, Yu
通讯作者:
Wu, Yu
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Xingliang Xu;W. Wanek;Cai-ping Zhou;Andreas Richter;Minghua Song;G. Cao;H. Ouyang;Y. Kuzyakov
通讯作者:
Xingliang Xu;W. Wanek;Cai-ping Zhou;Andreas Richter;Minghua Song;G. Cao;H. Ouyang;Y. Kuzyakov
影响因子:
11.6
作者:
Yuanhe Yang;Jingyun Fang;Wenhong Ma;Pete Smith;A. Mohammat;Shaopeng Wang;Wei Wang
通讯作者:
Yuanhe Yang;Jingyun Fang;Wenhong Ma;Pete Smith;A. Mohammat;Shaopeng Wang;Wei Wang