Rethinking Sino-Japanese Alienation
Rethinking Sino-Japanese Alienation
复制标题
反思中日疏远
DOI：
10.1093/oso/9780198851387.001.0001
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Buzan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Evelyn Goh;B. Buzan
自20世纪80年代以来的30年里，日本、中国和韩国之间关于战争、殖民和帝国的痛苦记忆越来越威胁到地区秩序和安全。在中日关系中，身份、领土和权力在一个特别致命的方向上拉在一起，在地缘政治和记忆竞争中产生危险的紧张局势。布赞和吴作栋探索了一种处理这一历史问题的新方法，首先，通过构建一种更加平衡和全球化的共同历史观，其次，通过勾勒出东北亚大国讨价还价的可能性。这本书首先将1840年以来的东北亚历史置于世界历史和系统规范的背景下，揭示了历史辩论的狭隘性质与什么是更大的共同故事。然后，本文探讨了在中日两国长期历史关系中达成战略协议的条件，并以此为基础勾勒出在该地区未来四种情景下，可能支撑中日两国之间新的当代大国协议的主要协议模式。这里采用的框架有意识地融合了历史背景;对财富，权力和利益的持久关注;以及东北亚国家之间以及与全球国际社会不断发展的遭遇之间的复杂关系。
Bitterly contested memories of war, colonization and empire among Japan, China, and Korea have increasingly threatened regional order and security over the three decades since the 1980s. In Sino-Japanese relations, identity, territory, and power pull together in a particularly lethal direction, generating dangerous tensions in both geopolitical and memory rivalries. Buzan and Goh explore a new approach to dealing with this history problem, first, by constructing a more balanced and global view of their shared history, and second, by sketching out the possibilities for a great power bargain in Northeast Asia. The book first puts Northeast Asia’s history since 1840 into both a world historical and a systematic normative context, exposing the parochial nature of the history debate in relation to what is a bigger shared story. It then explores the conditions under which China and Japan have been able to reach strategic bargains in the course of their long historical relationship, and uses this to sketch out the main modes of agreement that might underpin a new contemporary great power bargain between them in four future scenarios for the region. The frameworks adopted here consciously blend historical contextualization; enduring concerns with wealth, power, and interest; and the complex relationship between Northeast Asian states’ evolving encounters with each other and with global international society.