How Do People Think About Interdependence? A Multidimensional Model of Subjective Outcome Interdependence
How Do People Think About Interdependence? A Multidimensional Model of Subjective Outcome Interdependence
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/pspp0000166
复制
发表时间：
2018-10-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
de Vries, Reinout E.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gerpott, Fabiola H.;Balliet, Daniel;de Vries, Reinout E.
相互依赖是社会交往的一个基本特征。相互依赖理论指出，6个维度描述了社会情境之间的差异。在这里，我们检查这6个维度是否描述了人们如何看待他们与他人的相互依存关系。我们发现，人们（在原地和异地）可以可靠地区分情况下，根据5，但不是6，相互依存的维度：（a）相互依存，（B）权力，（c）冲突，（d）未来的相互依存，（e）信息的确定性。这个模型提供了一个独特的框架来理解人们如何思考社会情况相比，另一个最近的模型的情况conciliation（钻石）。此外，我们还研究了理论上形成相互依存感知的因素，如情境线索（例如，非语言行为）和个性（例如，HEXACO和社会价值取向）。我们还研究了在社会交往中的情感和合作行为的主观相互依存的影响。这种主观相互依赖的模型解释了人们在各种情况下所经历的情绪的实质性变化（即，幸福，悲伤，愤怒和厌恶），并解释了24%的合作方差，高于钻石模型。在这些研究中，我们开发和验证了一个多维度的主观结果的相互依赖性，可用于不同的情况和关系的情境相互依赖量表（SIS）。我们将讨论如何使用这种相互依赖的模型来更好地理解人们如何看待在亲密关系，组织和社会中遇到的社会情况。
Interdependence is a fundamental characteristic of social interactions. Interdependence Theory states that 6 dimensions describe differences between social situations. Here we examine if these 6 dimensions describe how people think about their interdependence with others in a situation. We find that people (in situ and ex situ) can reliably differentiate situations according to 5, but not 6, dimensions of interdependence: (a) mutual dependence, (b) power, (c) conflict, (d) future interdependence, and (e) information certainty. This model offers a unique framework for understanding how people think about social situations compared to another recent model of situation construal (DIAMONDS). Furthermore, we examine factors that are theorized to shape perceptions of interdependence, such as situational cues (e.g., nonverbal behavior) and personality (e.g., HEXACO and Social Value Orientation). We also study the implications of subjective interdependence for emotions and cooperative behavior during social interactions. This model of subjective interdependence explains substantial variation in the emotions people experience in situations (i.e., happiness, sadness, anger, and disgust), and explains 24% of the variance in cooperation, above and beyond the DIAMONDS model. Throughout these studies, we develop and validate a multidimensional measure of subjective outcome interdependence that can be used in diverse situations and relationships-the Situational Interdependence Scale (SIS). We discuss how this model of interdependence can be used to better understand how people think about social situations encountered in close relationships, organizations, and society.