Mokken Scale Analysis of Lifetime Responses on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale's Severity of Ideation Subscale.

Mokken Scale Analysis of Lifetime Responses on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale's Severity of Ideation Subscale.
复制标题

Mokken量表分析哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表的意念严重程度子量表的终生反应。

DOI:
10.1177/1073191120913626
复制
发表时间:
2021-09
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
A. Harris, Julia
A. Harris, Julia
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tabares, Jeffrey V.;Butner, Jonathan E.;Bryan, Craig J.;A. Harris, Julia

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

自杀风险筛查假设自杀想法和行为存在于一个连续的、分层的谱中,一些自杀想法与自杀行为的更大风险有关。然而,基于分层模型的筛选措施可能无法捕获自杀风险结构。本研究评估了哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(CSSRS)的心理测量学特性,包括(a)人与人之间测量维度,(B)捕获自杀风险结构的项目效用,以及(c)分层风险模型的可维持性。我们发现,CSSRS功能不同的个体之间和内部,CSSRS项目捕获更多的自杀风险结构,在目前的实践中,CSSRS项目可能出现在正确的顺序。目前的CSSRS合理地代表了人内自杀风险,但不是人与人之间的风险。量表规范或替代评分可以促进人与人之间CSSRS维度的功能等效性和实用性。
Suicide risk screening assumes that suicidal thoughts and behaviors exist on a continuous, hierarchical spectrum with some suicidal thoughts implicated with greater risk for suicidal behaviors. However, screening measures based on the hierarchical model may not capture the suicide risk construct. This study assessed psychometric properties of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) for (a) between- and within-person measurement dimensions, (b) item utility in capturing the suicide risk construct, and (c) tenability of a hierarchical risk model. We found that the CSSRS functions differentially between and within individuals, CSSRS items capture more suicide risk construct, and that CSSRS items in current practice likely appear in the correct order. The current CSSRS reasonably represents within-person suicide risk, but not between-person risk. Scale norms or alternate scoring could facilitate functional equivalence and utility for between- and within-person CSSRS dimensions.
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0987
发表时间: 2015-09
期刊: JAMA psychiatry
影响因子: 25.8
作者:
Ursano RJ;Kessler RC;Stein MB;Naifeh JA;Aliaga PA;Fullerton CS;Sampson NA;Kao TC;Colpe LJ;Schoenbaum M;Cox KL;Heeringa SG;Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers Collaborators
通讯作者: Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers Collaborators
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2014.859510
发表时间: 2014-01-02
影响因子: 6
作者:
Bandalos, Deborah L.
通讯作者: Bandalos, Deborah L.
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2009.183483
发表时间: 2010-09-01
影响因子: 12.7
作者:
Jiang, Yongwen;Perry, Donald Kent;Hesser, Jana Earl
通讯作者: Hesser, Jana Earl
DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199806000-00011
发表时间: 1998-06-01
影响因子: 13.3
作者:
McKeown, RE;Garrison, CZ;Addy, CL
通讯作者: Addy, CL
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.06.005
发表时间: 2019-09-01
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
Shelef, Leah;Klomek, Anat Brunstein;Zalsman, Gil
通讯作者: Zalsman, Gil