Evaluation of a patient education platform for seborrheic dermatitis.
Evaluation of a patient education platform for seborrheic dermatitis.
复制标题
脂溢性皮炎患者教育平台的评估。
DOI：
10.1007/s00403-023-02681-8
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Chovatiya,Raj
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fakhraie,Sheiva;Erickson,Taylor;Chovatiya,Raj
脂溢性皮炎（SD）是一种常见的，负担沉重的炎症性皮肤病。关于患者在社交媒体上消费的视频的身份和质量知之甚少，以更好地了解和管理SD。我们评估了三个社交媒体平台-YouTube，TikTok和Instagram-的内容，质量和受欢迎程度。搜索词“脂溢性皮炎”、“头皮屑”、“摇篮帽”和“头皮屑”在每个平台上识别出视频。对每个关键词的前50个视频进行了分析。经过筛选，147个YouTube、132个Instagram和164个TikTok视频被收录。通过上传来源（医疗保健提供者/组织[HCP]/非HCP）、质量（准确/误导/无信息）、内容（教育/个人经历/娱乐/广告）和喜欢/观看次数对视频进行表征。通过卡方（分类）或Kruskal-Wallis（连续）检验分析数据。与TikTok和Instagram相比，YouTube包含的HCP制作的视频比例更高（分别为42.2/19.7/17.7%），并且包含更准确（52.4/28.0/32.9%）和教育（66.7/38.6/34.4%）的内容（全部p <0.0001）。非HCP负责创建跨平台的大多数视频，其中沿着的内容最不准确/无信息（65.9/86.8/78.6%）和非教育性（56.5/75.5/71.1%）（所有p <0.0001）。尽管内容和信息的质量较低，但TikTok视频的平均观看次数（2，418，872）和喜欢次数（184，395）最高（p <0.0001）。HCP与非HCP制作的视频仅在YouTube上观看频率更高。虽然所有不准确和娱乐/广告内容的观点和喜欢都很常见，但它们是TikTok和Instagram的最大特征（p <0.0001）。这些结果显示，所有平台上的标清视频观看量都很高，尤其是那些质量较低、信息量较少的内容，以及平台间的显著内容差异。需要进行更多研究，以更好地表征在线SD教育内容，并优化HCP主导的视频创建和患者视频观看量。
Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is a common, burdensome inflammatory skin disorder. Little is known about the identity and quality of videos patients consume on social media to better understand and manage SD. We evaluated three social media platforms—YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram—for content, quality, and popularity. Search terms “seborrheic dermatitis,” “dandruff,” “cradle cap,” and “flaky scalp” identified videos on each platform. The first 50 videos for each keyword were analyzed. After screening, 147 YouTube, 132 Instagram, and 164 TikTok videos were included. Videos were characterized by upload source (healthcare provider/organization [HCP]/non-HCP), quality (accurate/misleading/non-informative), content (educational/personal xperience/entertainment/advertisement), and number of likes/views. Data were analyzed by chi square (categorical) or Kruskal–Wallis (continuous) tests. YouTube contained a higher proportion of videos vs. TikTok and Instagram that were made by HCPs (42.2/19.7/17.7%, respectively) and contained more accurate (52.4/28.0/32.9%), and educational (66.7/38.6/34.4%) content (p <0.0001 for all). Non-HCPs were responsible for creating the majority of videos across platforms along with most inaccurate/non-informative (65.9/86.8/78.6%) and non-educational (56.5/75.5/71.1%) content (p <0.0001 for all). Despite lower quality of content and information, TikTok videos had the highest mean views (2,418,872) and likes (184,395) (p <0.0001 for all). HCP vs. non-HCP-made videos were viewed more frequently only on YouTube. Though views and likes were common for all inaccurate and entertainment/advertisement content, they were most characteristic of TikTok and Instagram (p <0.0001). These results show a high volume of SD video consumption across all platforms, especially those with lower quality and less informative content, and significant content difference across platforms. Additional studies are needed to better characterize online SD educational content and optimize HCP-led video creation and patient video consumption.