The development of a self-report measure to assess the location and intensity of pain in people with intellectual disabilities
The development of a self-report measure to assess the location and intensity of pain in people with intellectual disabilities
复制标题
DOI：
10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00078.x
复制
发表时间：
1998-02-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Caine, A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bromley, J;Emerson, E;Caine, A
研究人员对由 20 名智力障碍 (ID) 患者组成的目标组和由 20 名没有智力障碍者组成的对照组进行了一系列任务的表现调查，这些任务涉及根据一系列模拟疼痛经历的照片来判断疼痛位置（在身体图上）和疼痛强度（在模拟色标上）。研究结果表明：（一）93%的测试项目，目标组和对照组在判断疼痛部位方面没有差异； （2）随着时间的推移，目标组在判断疼痛位置方面的表现是稳定的：（3）智障人士在所有“轻度”疼痛刺激和36％的“严重”疼痛刺激上将疼痛图像评为比对照组更强烈； (4) 65% 的比较中，目标组在判断疼痛强度方面的表现在逻辑上是一致的（另外 10% 的项目具有明显的显着性趋势）； （5）目标群体在判断疼痛强度方面的表现随着时间的推移是稳定的；（6）目标群体的表现与认知能力指标无关。
The performance of a target group of 20 people with intellectual disability (ID) and a comparison group of 20 people who did not have ID was investigated on a series of tasks involving the judgement of the location of pain (on a bodymap) and the intensity of pain (on an analogue colour scale) in response to a series of photographs of simulated painful experiences. The results of the study indicated that: (I) there were no differences between the target and comparison groups in judging pain location for 93% of test items; (2) the performance of the target group in judging pain location was stable over time: (3) people with ID rated the pain images as more intense than the comparison group on all the 'mild' pain stimuli and 36% of the 'severe' pain stimuli; (4) the performance of the target group in judging pain intensity was logically consistent for 65% of comparisons (clear trends towards significance being apparent for a further 10% of items); (5) the performance of the target group in judging pain intensity was stable over time: and (6) the performance of the target group was unrelated to indicators of cognitive ability.