Precision prophylaxis: Identifying the optimal timing for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy based on type of BRCA1 and BRCA2 cluster region mutations.
Precision prophylaxis: Identifying the optimal timing for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy based on type of BRCA1 and BRCA2 cluster region mutations.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.036
复制
发表时间:
2020-02
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Rebbeck, Timothy R.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Solsky, Ian;Chen, Jinbo;Rebbeck, Timothy R.
Current risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) guidelines for individuals with BRCA1/2 mutations do not account for risk variability due to BRCA1/2 cluster region mutations that are associated with varying risks for the development of breast and ovarian cancer. We assessed whether current recommendations are appropriate for individual patients considering mutation-specific risks. Using a hypothetical cohort of patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, we constructed Markov models allowing for the estimation of mean life expectancy based upon BRCA1/2 mutation, the presence of a cluster region mutation (Ovarian Cancer Cluster Region (OCCR), Breast Cancer Cluster Region (BCCR), or non-BCCR/OCCR), age at time of BRCA1/2 diagnosis (20–65), and age at time of RRSO (21–80). For all BRCA1/2 mutation types, the optimal strategy was to undergo RRSO as early as possible. For BRCA1/2 carriers who delayed RRSO or who were identified with a mutation later in life, the OCCR mutation tended to be associated with lower life expectancy estimates than the BCCR and non-BCCR/OCCR mutations. Minimal delays in RRSO (i.e., neighboring 5-year intervals) were associated with minor losses in life expectancy. Variables associated with greatest impact on life expectancy included ovarian cancer risk after RRSO, breast cancer mortality rate, non-cancer mortality associated with RRSO, and breast cancer stage distribution. BRCA1/2 cluster regions may provide more precise estimates of life expectancy in counselling and shared decision-making. The most appropriate timing for RRSO is a complex decision and must be individualized for each patient.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
Atchley, Deann P.;Albarracin, Constance T.;Arun, Banu K.
通讯作者:
Arun, Banu K.
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
Bonadies, Danielle Campfield;Moyer, Anne;Matloff, Ellen T.
通讯作者:
Matloff, Ellen T.
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Dean, Marleah
通讯作者:
Dean, Marleah
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Macia, Francesc;Porta, Miquel;Castells, Xavier
通讯作者:
Castells, Xavier
影响因子:
120.7
作者:
Iqbal, Javaid;Ginsburg, Ophira;Narod, Steven A.
通讯作者:
Narod, Steven A.