Me and My Critics: Students' Responses to Architectural Jury Criticism.

Me and My Critics: Students' Responses to Architectural Jury Criticism.
复制标题

我和我的批评者:学生对建筑评审团批评的回应。

DOI:
10.2307/1319543
复制
发表时间:
1979
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Peterson
J. Peterson
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Peterson

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

存在审查陪审团附带的一些其他问题(奥尔登,1970年)。在这里,陪审团被发现增加了陪审员之间的共识考虑到陪审团的性质,这并不奇怪。陪审团开始时,一般由学生展示他们的作品或对指定问题的解决方案,然后学生可以讨论或描述。评审团通常由教师组成,但同行经常积极参与随后的讨论。这个讨论
exist examines juries incidental to some other issues (Alden, 1970). Here juries were found to increase consenses among the jurors-not a surprising finding considering the nature of juries. Juries generally begin with a student display of their work or solution to an assigned problem which the student may then discuss or describe. The jury is usually composed of faculty members but peers often participate actively in the discussion which follows. This discussion