Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of published studies: an overview and best practices.
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of published studies: an overview and best practices.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/jto.0b013e31822461b0
复制
发表时间：
2011-08
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mandrekar SJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mandrekar JN;Mandrekar SJ
系统性综述和荟萃分析方法广泛用于临床竞技场，以整合来自已发表的患者人群研究的结局数据，这些研究解决了一组相关的研究假设。这一系列研究的可信度取决于如何选择研究，如何收集数据以及如何报告结果。在这份简短的报告中，我们根据PRISMA（系统性综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目）指南概述了系统性综述和荟萃分析的最低报告要求。与任何研究一样，遵循一套既定的指南对于研究结果的质量和一致性以及临床效用的评估至关重要。
Systematic reviews and meta-analytic approaches are widely used in the clinical arena to integrate outcome data from published studies in a patient population that address a set of related research hypotheses. The credibility of this line of research is dependent on how the studies are chosen, how the data are assembled and how the results are reported. In this brief report, we provide an overview of the minimum set of reporting requirements for systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. As with any research, following a set of established guidelines is essential for quality and consistency of the findings across studies, and for assessment of clinical utility.