Insights into the periodic gust response of airfoils
Insights into the periodic gust response of airfoils
复制标题
深入了解机翼的周期性阵风响应
DOI：
10.1017/jfm.2019.537
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Cameron
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nathaniel J;Kissing;Johannes;Wester;Tom T. B;Sebastian;Schiffmann;Jakirlic;Hölling;Michael;Peinke;Joachim;Tropea;Cameron
The unsteady lift response of an airfoil in a sinusoidal gust has in the past been modelled by two different transfer functions: the first-order Sears function and the second-order Atassi function. Previous studies have shown that the Sears function holds in experiments, but recently Cordes et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 811, 2017) reported experimental data that corresponded to the Atassi function rather than the Sears function. In order to clarify the observed discrepancy, the specific differences between these models are isolated analytically. To this end, data and analysis are confined to unloaded airfoils. These differences are related to physical gust parameters, and gusts with these parameters are then produced in wind-tunnel experiments using an active-grid gust generator. Measurements of the unsteady gust loads on an airfoil in the wind tunnel at Reynolds numbers ( confirm that the Sears and Atassi functions differ only in convention: the additional gust component of the Atassi problem can be scaled so that the Atassi function collapses onto the Sears function. These experiments, complemented by numerical simulations of the set-up, validate both models across a range of gust parameters. Finally, the influence of boundary-layer turbulence and the turbulent wake of the gust generator on experimental convergence with model predictions is investigated. These results serve to clarify the conditions under which the Sears and Atassi functions can be applied, and demonstrate that the Sears function can effectively model unsteady forces even when significant fluctuations in the streamwise velocity are present.
The unsteady lift response of an airfoil in a sinusoidal gust has in the past been modelled by two different transfer functions: the first-order Sears function and the second-order Atassi function. Previous studies have shown that the Sears function holds in experiments, but recently Cordes et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 811, 2017) reported experimental data that corresponded to the Atassi function rather than the Sears function. In order to clarify the observed discrepancy, the specific differences between these models are isolated analytically. To this end, data and analysis are confined to unloaded airfoils. These differences are related to physical gust parameters, and gusts with these parameters are then produced in wind-tunnel experiments using an active-grid gust generator. Measurements of the unsteady gust loads on an airfoil in the wind tunnel at Reynolds numbers ( confirm that the Sears and Atassi functions differ only in convention: the additional gust component of the Atassi problem can be scaled so that the Atassi function collapses onto the Sears function. These experiments, complemented by numerical simulations of the set-up, validate both models across a range of gust parameters. Finally, the influence of boundary-layer turbulence and the turbulent wake of the gust generator on experimental convergence with model predictions is investigated. These results serve to clarify the conditions under which the Sears and Atassi functions can be applied, and demonstrate that the Sears function can effectively model unsteady forces even when significant fluctuations in the streamwise velocity are present.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Xiaowei Zhao;Kevin Gouder;J. Graham;D. Limebeer
通讯作者：
Xiaowei Zhao;Kevin Gouder;J. Graham;D. Limebeer
定制湍流流入条件下翼型的气动行为
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Dominik Traphan;T. Wester;J. Peinke;G. Gülker
通讯作者：
G. Gülker
湍流尾流中转子噪声产生的大涡模拟研究
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Junye Wang;Kan Wang;Meng Wang
通讯作者：
Meng Wang
通过双平行翼型循环产生正弦横向和纵向阵风的风洞
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1974
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
N. Ham;P. Bauer;T. L. Lawrence
通讯作者：
T. L. Lawrence
串联两个气缸尾流干扰的雷诺应力模型：传统与涡流解析闭合
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
R. Maduta;M. Ullrich;S. Jakirlic
通讯作者：
S. Jakirlic