A sense of power: the roots of America's global role
A sense of power: the roots of America's global role
复制标题
权力感:美国全球角色的根源
DOI:
10.1093/ia/iiw035
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Mistry K
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mistry K
In this judicious book, John A. Thompson sets out to explain why the United States came to play a prominent role in world affairs. Focusing on the period from the late nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth century, this is a study of the evolution of US foreign policy and internal discussions about it, particularly how Americans debated and practised foreign affairs. It may be deeply unfashionable in some quarters, but Thompson shows how the diplomatic history approach, when utilized effectively and skilfully, continues to have relevance and can make a key contribution. His core argument is that power is the overlooked dimension to understanding how America approached foreign policy. He finds the most commonly cited strategic and economic explanations unsatisfactory. Realism, at least in terms of upholding national security and financial interests, only tells us so much. Ideology is also only briefly cited—curiously briefly given the broad historical attention to ideological factors; it too, according to Thompson, does not account for why the US assumed a truly global role. Debates on the latter often boil down to value judgements on the merits or virtue of American leadership. Yet Thompson is providing a non-polemical answer to an intellectual question, instead of advocating or moralizing. The result is a nuanced and persuasive work of scholarship. Offering a wide-lens account of seminal moments and debates concerning America’s role in the world, A sense of power is not a detailed chronology of the events of the first half of the twentieth century. The major conflicts—chiefly the two hot World Wars and the onset of Cold War—are present of course, but considered in the context of deeper US international involvement. Rooted in a wider reading and engagement with vast secondary literatures, Thompson offers a superb historiographical deconstruction of historical and political