Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity
Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/1467-9280.00328
复制
发表时间：
2001-03-01
影响因子：
8.2
通讯作者：
Banaji, MR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cunningham, WA;Preacher, KJ;Banaji, MR
近年来，已经开发了几种测量内隐社会认知的技术。尽管它们的使用越来越多，但很少有人关注它们的可靠性和有效性。本文对一些隐性态度测量的项间一致性、稳定性和收敛效度进行了直接评估。对黑人和白人的态度在四个不同的场合进行测量，每次间隔两周，使用三种相对隐性的测量（反应窗评价启动、内隐联想测试和反应窗内隐联想测试）和一种显性测量（现代种族主义量表）。通过潜在变量分析纠正项目间的不一致后，我们发现（a）稳定性指数得到改善，（b）隐含测量值彼此显着相关，形成单一潜在因素。反应潜伏期隐式测量的心理测量特性比最近建议的具有更高的完整性。
In recent years, several techniques have been developed to measure implicit social cognition. Despite their increased use, little attention has been devoted to their reliability and validity. This article undertakes a direct assessment of the interitem consistency, stability, and convergent validity of some implicit attitude measures. Attitudes toward blacks and whites were measured on four separate occasions, each 2 weeks apart, using three relatively implicit measures (response-window evaluative priming, the Implicit Association Test, and the response-window Implicit Association Test) and one explicit measure (Modern Racism Scale). After correcting for interitem inconsistency with latent variable analyses, we found that (a) stability indices improved and (b) implicit measures were substantially correlated with each other, forming a single latent factor. The psychometric properties of response-latency implicit measures have greater integrity than recently suggested.