Differences in Risk Factors for Rotator Cuff Tears between Elderly Patients and Young Patients
Differences in Risk Factors for Rotator Cuff Tears between Elderly Patients and Young Patients
复制标题
DOI：
10.18926/amo/55665
复制
发表时间：
2018-02-01
影响因子：
0.5
通讯作者：
Machida, Hirohisa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Watanabe, Akihisa;Ono, Qana;Machida, Hirohisa
目前还不清楚的是，导致肩袖撕裂的危险因素在所有年龄段都是相同的，还是在年轻人和老年人之间有所不同。在这项研究中，我们使用分类和回归树分析作为非线性回归分析的方法来检查肩袖撕裂的危险因素。肩袖撕裂组65例，完整肩袖组45例。进行分类和回归树分析来预测肩袖撕裂。目标因素为肩袖撕裂；解释变量为年龄、性别、创伤和临界肩关节角度>= 35度。在分类和回归树分析的结果中，树在64岁时被划分。对于b> = 64岁的患者，在创伤时分树。对于年龄< 64岁的患者，在临界肩角>= 35度处分树。临界肩关节角度>= 35度的比值比在所有年龄段均显著（5.89），在< 64岁患者中显著（10.3），而创伤仅在>= 64岁患者中显著（5.13）。在本研究中，年龄、外伤和临界肩关节角度>= 35度与肩袖撕裂有关。然而，这些危险因素在不同年龄段表现出不同的趋势，而不是线性关系。
It has been unclear whether the risk factors for rotator cuff tears are the same at all ages or differ between young and older populations. In this study, we examined the risk factors for rotator cuff tears using classification and regression tree analysis as methods of nonlinear regression analysis. There were 65 patients in the rotator cuff tears group and 45 patients in the intact rotator cuff group. Classification and regression tree analysis was performed to predict rotator cuff tears. The target factor was rotator cuff tears; explanatory variables were age, sex, trauma, and critical shoulder angle >= 35 degrees. In the results of classification and regression tree analysis, the tree was divided at age 64. For patients aged >= 64, the tree was divided at trauma. For patients aged < 64, the tree was divided at critical shoulder angle >= 35 degrees. The odds ratio for critical shoulder angle >= 35 degrees was significant for all ages (5.89), and for patients aged < 64 (10.3) while trauma was only a significant factor for patients aged >= 64 (5.13). Age, trauma, and critical shoulder angle >= 35 degrees were related to rotator cuff tears in this study. However, these risk factors showed different trends according to age group, not a linear relationship.