Adaptation and Evolution in Heliconius: A Defense of NeoDarwinism
Adaptation and Evolution in Heliconius: A Defense of NeoDarwinism
复制标题
Heliconius的适应与进化:新达尔文主义的辩护
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1981
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Turner
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Turner
The neoDarwinian theory of evolution (or "modem synthesis") may not explain evolution in the long term. In particular, it has been suggested that it explains neither the discontinuities in the fossil record [see reports on the recent conference in Chicago (68, 71a)], nor the origin of complex, integrated adaptations (49, 90). To study such matters we must find a group in which we can investigate the genetics and ecology of present day populations, as well as evolutionary trends extending over as long a period as possible: In the absence of a mimetic drosophiloid snail with polytene chromosomes and an extensive fossil record, and until molecular evolutionists can resolve the controversy over just which amino acid substitutions are selected and which are neutral, we must make do with organisms that have only some of the required properties. The extensive study of the Hawaiian Drosophila is well known, but has not yet directly addressed the question posed here; however, an elegant study (34) showed that changes over a period of around 8000 years in populations of the snail Cepaea (as revealed by semi-fossilized shells) could be well accounted for by (a) the selective effects of temperature known to act on the forms in present day populations, and (b) the independently known fluctuations of the British climate during that time. In the genus Heliconius, the passion flower or passion vine butterflies, we can also investigate such matters, for our combined knowledge of their adaptation, ecology, genetics, and phylogeny and of the history of the South American rain forests where they live allows us to bridge the gap between population genetics and long-term evolution. In this review, I address pri