Operational Definition of Active and Healthy Aging (AHA): The European Innovation Partnership (EIP) on AHA Reference Site Questionnaire: Montpellier October 20-21, 2014, Lisbon July 2, 2015
Operational Definition of Active and Healthy Aging (AHA): The European Innovation Partnership (EIP) on AHA Reference Site Questionnaire: Montpellier October 20-21, 2014, Lisbon July 2, 2015
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jamda.2015.09.004
复制
发表时间：
2015-12-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Farrell, John
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bousquet, Jean;Malva, Joao;Farrell, John
为了进行比较，需要一个积极健康老龄化（AHA）的核心操作定义。欧洲积极和健康老龄化创新伙伴关系参考站点网络提出的一个概念性AHA框架包括若干项目，如功能（个人能力和基本身体系统）、福祉、活动和参与以及疾病（包括非传染性疾病、虚弱、精神和口腔健康失调）。用于评估AHA概念框架的工具具有共同的适用性和可用性属性。根据需要和问题，该方法包括核心和可选领域/工具。根据世界卫生组织残疾评估表2.0 （WHODAS 2.0）的衡量，一个主要的共同领域是功能。WHODAS 2.0可用于所有疾病和健康个体。它涵盖了参考站点网络提出的许多AHA维度。然而，WHODAS 2.0并未包括AHA评估建议的所有维度。第二个常见领域是健康相关生活质量（HRQoL）。一份以蜘蛛网形式的美国心脏协会调查问卷报告已被提出，以促进个人和感兴趣群体之间的通常比较。(C) 2015年由Elsevier Inc.代表AMDA（后急性和长期护理医学协会）出版。
A core operational definition of active and healthy aging (AHA) is needed to conduct comparisons. A conceptual AHA framework proposed by the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing Reference Site Network includes several items such as functioning (individual capability and underlying body systems), well-being, activities and participation, and diseases (including non-communicable diseases, frailty, mental and oral health disorders). The instruments proposed to assess the conceptual framework of AHA have common applicability and availability attributes. The approach includes core and optional domains/instruments depending on the needs and the questions. A major common domain is function, as measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). WHODAS 2.0 can be used across all diseases and healthy individuals. It covers many of the AHA dimensions proposed by the Reference Site network. However, WHODAS 2.0 does not include all dimensions proposed for AHA assessment. The second common domain is health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A report of the AHA questionnaire in the form of a spider net has been proposed to facilitate usual comparisons across individuals and groups of interest. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.