Rationale for stabilization.

Rationale for stabilization.
复制标题

稳定的理由。

DOI:
10.1902/jop.1976.47.7.405
复制
发表时间:
1976
期刊:
The Journal of Periodontology
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
K. Lemmerman
K. Lemmerman
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
K. Lemmerman

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

1.为了夹板固定的目的而主观地将正常牙周组织和患病牙周组织分开是人为的。除了咬合引起的继发性创伤外,患病牙周组织应与正常牙周组织一样进行夹板治疗。2.稳定化的有效条件是:I.防止流动A。急性创伤后。B。在咬合治疗中。二.防止漂移A.更换缺失的牙齿。B。后牙学三.用于治疗继发性咬合创伤。A.为了功能稳定。B。对牙周炎的进展有未知的影响。3.咬合创伤与牙周炎的关系目前尚不清楚。4.需要一种临床试验,将来自闭塞的创伤的组织学体征与临床发现相关联。5.在牙周病患者治疗的初始阶段或手术阶段,一般不需要临时夹板固定,因为咬合造成的继发性创伤不会影响愈合。
1. The subjective separation of the normal and the diseased periodontium for splinting purposes is artificial. With the exception of cases of secondary trauma from occlusion, the diseased periodontium should be treated in the same manner as the normal periodontium with regards to splinting. 2. Retionales for stabilization found to be valid are: I. Prevention of mobility A. Post acute trauma. B. In occlusal therapy. II. Prevention of drifting A. Replacement of missing teeth. B. Postorthodontics. III. In treatment of secondary trauma for occlusion. A. For functional stability. B. With unknown effects on the progression of periodontitis. 3. The relationship of trauma from occlusion and periodontitis is unclear at this time. 4. A need exists for a clinical test correlating histologic signs of trauma from occlusion and clinical findings. 5. Temporary splinting generally is not indicated during the initial or surgical phase of treatment of the periodontal patient, because mobility short of secondary trauma from occlusion does not impair healing.