Do Curriculum-Based External Exit Exam Systems Enhance Student Achievement?.
Do Curriculum-Based External Exit Exam Systems Enhance Student Achievement?.
复制标题
基于课程的外部毕业考试系统是否可以提高学生的成绩？
DOI：
10.1037/e383622004-001
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Bishop
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Bishop
两位总统、全国州长协会和许多蓝带小组呼吁为核心科目制定国家内容标准，并通过考试评估这些标准的实现情况。例如，竞争力政策理事会主张，“对中学学生个人进行外部评估，评估结果应当是取得上大学和获得工资更高的更好工作资格的一个主要因素，但不是唯一因素（1993年，第30页）。“美国教师联合会倡导这样一种制度：定期对学生进行测试，以确定他们是否达到标准，如果没有达到标准，该制度将给予适当的援助和干预。直到他们达到标准，他们将无法从高中毕业或进入大学（AFT 1995年第1-2页）。据称，基于世界级内容标准的基于课程的外部退出考试系统（CBEEES）将改善核心科目的教学和学习。有什么证据支持这种说法？纽约的摄政考试就是这样一个系统的例子。纽约的学生是否比其他州有类似社会经济背景的学生表现更好？在美国以外，这种制度是常规，而不是例外。这种制度对学校政策、教学和学生学习有什么影响？
Two presidents, the National Governors Association and numerous blue ribbon panels have called for the development of state content standards for core subjects and examinations that assess the achievement of these standards. The Competitiveness Policy Council, for example, advocates that "external assessments be given to individual students at the secondary level and that the results should be a major but not exclusive factor qualifying for college and better jobs at better wages (1993, p. 30)." The American Federation of Teachers advocates a system in which: Students are periodically tested on whether they're reaching the standards, and if they are not, the system responds with appropriate assistance and intervention. Until they meet the standards, they won't be able to graduate from high school or enter college (AFT 1995 p. 1-2). It is claimed that curriculum-based external exit exam systems (CBEEES), based on world class content standards will improve teaching and learning of core subjects. What evidence is there for this claim? New York's Regents Exams are an example of such a system. Do New York students outperform students with similar socio-economic backgrounds from other states? Outside the United States such systems are the rule, not the exception. What impacts have such systems had on school policies, teaching and student learning?