Consciousness and the 21st century operating room.
Consciousness and the 21st century operating room.
复制标题
意识与21世纪手术室。
DOI:
10.1097/aln.0b013e3182a7cad1
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
8.8
通讯作者:
Mashour,GeorgeA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mashour,GeorgeA
During discussions of intraoperative monitoring with our anesthesiology residents, I like to describe the following clinical scenario involving a new patient and a rather unusual cardiologist. After waiting months for an appointment, Mrs. Jones is befuddled that her “heart doctor” performs only a neurologic examination and, on the basis of that examination, has ordered a stress test. She is flabbergasted to discover that this test consists of a brisk run on the treadmill followed by diagnostic evaluations with electroencephalography and brain scanning. Why is Mrs. Jones confused and upset? The residents—and you—can easily identify the problem: the cardiologist is making inferences about the cardiovascular system based on data from the nervous system, despite the fact that the target organ of cardiology is the heart. The good news, of course, is that real-life cardiology doesn’t work this way… the bad news is that real-life anesthesiology does. In operating rooms around the world, anesthesia providers are making inferences about the nervous system based on data from the cardiovascular system, despite the fact that—for general anesthetics—the target organ of anesthesiology is the brain. In this issue of Anesthesiology, Jordan and colleagues take multiple approaches to assessing brain function during propofol anesthesia in humans and pave the way for the neurobiology of consciousness to inform our clinical practice. 1In brief, Jordan and his coinvestigators found that propofol-induced unconsciousness is associated with a reduction of directed connectivity from anterior to posterior brain structures (see fig. 1 for summary). They derived this conclusion from the analysis of electroencephalography using the technique of symbolic transfer entropy, a method based in information theory. This has neurobiological significance, because such “top-down” or “feedback” processing from the prefrontal cortex is thought to be particularly important for human consciousness. 2 Impairment of feedback connectivity from frontal to parietal areas of the brain has previously been associated with induction of unconsciousness using propofol, sevoflurane and ketamine in humans (see table 1 for review of relevant studies) 3–9 as well as isoflurane in rats. 10 The current study is unique because it extended investigation in two directions. First, in addition to using electroencephalography, Jordan and colleagues used functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess underlying brain events. Second, they conducted a separate analysis of their high-density electroencephalography recordings and identified selective changes in the frontal region that could be amenable to intraoperative monitoring. As such, they have helped bridge a translational gap and advanced our understanding of anesthetic mechanisms as well as anesthetic monitoring. We now know based on their neuroimaging findings that the loss of top-down (feedback) processing observed in prior studies is associated with functional disconnections between anterior and