Introduction: Competition and Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific Region
Introduction: Competition and Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific Region
复制标题
引言:亚太地区的竞争与合作
DOI:
10.1093/irap/lcaa021
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
1.4
通讯作者:
Keisuke Iida
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sugie;Ai;八木浩司,檜垣大助,佐藤剛,林一成;杉江あい;鈴木基史;Narufumi Kadomatsu;杉江あい;佐藤 浩;Narufumi Kadomatsu;杉江あい;Keisuke Iida
Sino-US relations also followed a similar path. While the two countries regularly engaged in dialogues such as the Strategic Economic Dialogue (Bush) and the Strategic and Economic Dialogue (Obama), Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s speech at the ASEAN Regional Forum in July 2010, showing a new US resolve to get involved in the South China Sea disputes, clearly changed the tone of the bilateral relationship from that of cooperation to competition. The ‘pivot’or ‘rebalance’strategy of the Obama administration did not help matters. China’s militarization of the South China Sea, increasingly obvious under Xi Jinping’s leadership, affected the course of Sino-ASEAN relations as well.Competition between China’s loose alignment—consisting of Russia, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Laos, Cambodia and Pakistan—and the United States’ coalition—including formal allies Australia and Japan and new partner India—is conspicuous in the Indo-Pacific region. However, numerous cooperative initiatives are also undertaken across the cleavage lines between the two. In trade, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), which includes ASEAN, China, Japan and India, is such a venture. In finance, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank is a hybrid, situated in the middle of the spectrum of intra-and crosscoalition cooperation. That Japan and the United States stayed out of it makes it appear as intra-coalition cooperation, but it includes India, ASEAN, and all major European countries. Thus, it is not true that only competition exists between the China-and the US-centered groups, as was during the Cold War period, or that cooperation exists only within China’s and the United States’ respective spheres of influence.