Characterizing the Use of Research-Community Partnerships in Studies of Evidence-Based Interventions in Children's Community Services.

Characterizing the Use of Research-Community Partnerships in Studies of Evidence-Based Interventions in Children's Community Services.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s10488-014-0622-9
复制
发表时间:
2016-01
期刊:
Administration and policy in mental health
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Garland AF
Garland AF
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brookman-Frazee L;Stahmer A;Stadnick N;Chlebowski C;Herschell A;Garland AF

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本研究的特点是利用研究社区伙伴关系(rcp)来定制基于证据的干预、培训和实施模式,通过项目主要研究者和社区合作伙伴完成的一项调查,为不同的儿童问题和服务环境提供服务。为了在前人研究的基础上进一步阐明通过协作获得的隐性知识,本文对以下方面进行了研究:(1)使用RCP模型的研究特点;(2) RCP功能、过程和产品;(3)为社区实施量身定制循证实践(ebp)的过程;(4)与社区提供者和消费者合作的利益和挑战的看法。结果表明,研究人员单独或共同参与了几乎所有rcp的形成;人际关系和业务流程被视为主要挑战;社区伙伴的作用包括比传统的研究活动更多地参与实施和招募参与者;伙伴关系过程被认为增加了干预和研究的相关性和“契合度”。
This study characterized the use of research community partnerships (RCPs) to tailor evidence-based intervention, training, and implementation models for delivery across different childhood problems and service contexts using a survey completed by project principal investigators and community partners. To build on previous RCP research and to explicate the tacit knowledge gained through collaborative efforts, the following were examined: (1) characteristics of studies using RCP models; (2) RCP functioning, processes, and products; (3) processes of tailoring evidence-based practices (EBPs) for community implementation ; and (4) perceptions of the benefits and challenges of collaborating with community providers and consumers. Results indicated that researchers were solely or jointly involved in the formation of almost all of the RCPs; interpersonal and operational processes were perceived as primary challenges; community partners’ roles included greater involvement in implementation and participant recruitment than more traditional research activities; and the partnership process was perceived to increase the relevance and “fit” of interventions and research.