Social Dominance Theory: A New Synthesis
Social Dominance Theory: A New Synthesis
复制标题
社会支配理论：一个新的综合
DOI：
10.4324/9780203505984-18
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
F. Pratto
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Sidanius;F. Pratto
正如我们在前一章中所看到的，许多关于社会态度和群体间关系的经典和当代理论为我们提供了一些关于群体间冲突、刻板印象和群体压迫的本质和动力的重要见解。然而，还需要认真努力将这些见解整合到一个连贯和全面的理论模型中。为了实现这一目标，并对人类压迫的几乎令人厌烦的重复性质有更坚定的认识，我们发展了社会支配理论（SDT）。虽然这种方法在许多方面都是新的，但它的主要优点是它将第1章中回顾的最关键和最有用的组件和模型联系在一起。我们的新综合的最重要的来源可以在以下思想中找到：（a）权威主义人格理论，（B）罗基奇的政治行为双价值理论，（c）布鲁默的群体立场理论，（d）马克思主义和新古典主义精英理论，（e）政治态度和舆论研究的结果，（f）社会认同理论（SIT），和（g）进化心理学中的现代思想虽然SDT受到人格心理学，社会心理学和政治社会学模型的影响，但它既不是严格的心理学理论也不是社会学理论，而是试图将个人人格和态度的世界与制度行为和社会结构的领域联系起来。因此，特殊和差别待遇是一种尝试，将几个层次的分析纳入一个连贯的理论框架。
As we saw in the preceding chapter, a number of classical and contemporary theories of social attitudes and intergroup relations have given us some important insights into the nature and dynamics of intergroup conflict, stereotyping, and group oppression. However, there has yet to be a serious effort to integrate these insights into one coherent and comprehensive theoretical model. In an effort to accomplish this and gain a firmer purchase on the almost boringly repetitive nature of human oppression, we have developed social dominance theory (SDT). While this approach is new in many ways, its primary virtue is that it ties together the most critical and useful components and models reviewed in Chapter 1. The most important sources for our new synthesis can be found in the ideas of (a) authoritarian personality theory, (b) Rokeach's two-value theory of political behavior, (c) Blumer's group positions theory, (d) Marxism and neoclassical elite theories, (e) results from political attitude and public opinion research, (f) social identity theory (SIT), and (g) modern thinking within evolutionary psychology While SDT has been influenced by models within personality psychology, social psychology, and political sociology, it is neither strictly a psychological nor a sociological theory, but rather an attempt to connect the worlds of individual personality and attitudes with the domains of institutional behavior and social structure. Thus, SDT is an attempt to integrate several levels of analysis into one coherent theoretical framework.