Comparison between two braking control methods integrating energy recovery for a two-wheel front driven electric vehicle
Comparison between two braking control methods integrating energy recovery for a two-wheel front driven electric vehicle
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.enconman.2016.05.094
复制
发表时间：
2016-08
影响因子：
10.4
通讯作者：
Khaled Itani;A. D. Bernardinis;Z. Khatir;A. Jammal
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Khaled Itani;A. D. Bernardinis;Z. Khatir;A. Jammal
本文对两轮前轮驱动电动汽车的两种制动方式进行了比较，最大限度地提高了混合储能系统的能量回收。第一种方法是利用鲁棒滑模控制器控制制动时的车轮滑移率。第二种方法将基于欧洲经委会对M1乘用车的R13H约束。用于仿真的车辆模型是一个简化的五自由度模型。它由两台30千瓦的永磁同步电机(PMSM)驱动，在制动阶段回收能量。使用MatLab/Simulink®在不同道路类型的路面上进行多个极端制动条件下的模拟结果的比较。仿真结果表明，在初始车速为80 km/h的情况下，两种控制制动方式的能量回收效率之差对ECES约束控制方法是有利的，能量回收效率在高摩擦路型的3.7%到中摩擦路型的11.2%之间变化。在低摩擦路面类型下，由于文中所述的不同原因，其差异可达6.6%。对稳定减速问题也进行了详细的讨论。
This paper presents the comparison between two braking methods for a two-wheel front driven Electric Vehicle maximizing the energy recovery on the Hybrid Energy Storage System. The first method consists in controlling the wheels slip ratio while braking using a robust sliding mode controller. The second method will be based on ECE R13H constraints for an M1 passenger vehicle. The vehicle model used for simulation is a simplified five degrees of freedom model. It is driven by two 30 kW permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) recovering energy during braking phases. Several simulation results for extreme braking conditions will be performed and compared on various road type surfaces using Matlab/Simulink®. For an initial speed of 80 km/h, simulation results demonstrate that the difference of energy recovery efficiency between the two control braking methods is beneficial to the ECE constraints control method and it can vary from 3.7% for high friction road type to 11.2% for medium friction road type. At low friction road type, the difference attains 6.6% due to different reasons treated in the paper. The stability deceleration is also discussed and detailed.