INTERPERSONAL DECEPTION .5. ACCURACY IN DECEPTION DETECTION
INTERPERSONAL DECEPTION .5. ACCURACY IN DECEPTION DETECTION
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/03637759409376340
复制
发表时间：
1994-12-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
ROCKWELL, P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BURGOON, JK;BULLER, DB;ROCKWELL, P
以往对欺骗检测准确性的研究通常是在非交互环境下进行的，这导致许多潜在的显著影响被忽视。在人际欺骗理论的指导下，本实验考察了怀疑、欺骗类型、问题类型、关系熟悉度和专业知识对判断真假准确性的影响。一组是新手成人样本，另一组是专家样本（军事情报指导和相关军事人员），他们分别与陌生人或熟人进行访谈。访谈过程中，受访者给出了一些真实的答案和一些欺骗性的答案，后者是三种类型之一。面试官中有一半是被诱导产生怀疑的，他们遵循了一个标准的面试程序，其中引入了不同的问题策略。结果表明：(a)真相的准确性比欺骗的准确性高得多，(b)新手比专家更准确，(c)准确性取决于欺骗的类型和是否存在怀疑，(d)怀疑损害了专家的准确性，(e)对熟悉的人的真相偏见加剧，特别是当采访者怀疑时，(f)问题策略改善或加剧了不准确性。
Previous research on accuracy in deception detection has typically occurred in a noninteractive context, which has resulted in many potentially salient influences being ignored. Guided by interpersonal deception theory, the current experiment examined the influences of suspicion, deception type, question type, relational familiarity, and expertise on accuracy in detecting truth and deceit. An adult sample of novices and a second sample of experts (military intelligence instructions and related military personnel) participated in interviews with strangers or acquaintances during which interviewees gave some truthful answers and some deceptive answers, the latter being one of three types. Interviewers, half of whom were induced to be suspicious, followed a standard interview protocol that introduced different question strategies. Results showed that (a) accuracy was much higher on truth than deception, (b) novices were more accurate than experts, (c) accuracy depended on type of deception being perpetrated and whether suspicion was present or absent, (d) suspicion impaired accuracy for experts, (e) truth-biases intensified with familiar others, especially when interviewers were suspicious, and (f) question strategy ameliorated or aggravated inaccuracy.