THE RELIABILITY OF ABUSE HISTORY REPORTS - A COMPARISON OF 2 INQUIRY FORMATS
THE RELIABILITY OF ABUSE HISTORY REPORTS - A COMPARISON OF 2 INQUIRY FORMATS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/0010-440x(91)90009-2
复制
发表时间：
1991-03-01
影响因子：
7.3
通讯作者：
EISEN, SV
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DILL, DL;CHU, JA;EISEN, SV
我们以两种独立的形式比较了患者关于身体或性虐待史的报告：入院接受住院治疗的标准精神科入院访谈，以及随后关于各种形式的儿童早期创伤的秘密自我报告调查。对于92名连续入院的女性患者，在收容面谈中获得的几乎所有关于虐待史的报告都与后来在调查中获得的报告一致。然而，在吸毒者表格中获得的没有滥用史的调查结果往往与调查中获得的报告不一致，后者的频率是吸毒者报告的两倍。面试官的性别与报道无关。这些数据表明，在接受最初对虐待历史的否认时，要谨慎对待。
We compared patients' reports about histories of physical or sexual abuse in two independent formats: the standard psychiatric intake interview at admission for inpatient treatment, and a subsequent confidential self-report survey about various forms of early childhood trauma. For 92 consecutively admitted female patients, nearly all reports of abuse histories obtained in the intake interview were consistent with later reports obtained in the survey. However, findings of no abuse history obtained in the intake format were frequently inconsistent with reports obtained in the survey, which were twice as frequent as intake reports. Gender of the intake interviewer was not related to reporting. These data suggest caution in accepting at face value initial denials of abuse histories.