Insanity plea: predicting not guilty by reason of insanity adjudications.
Insanity plea: predicting not guilty by reason of insanity adjudications.
复制标题
精神错乱抗辩：因精神错乱裁决而预测无罪。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1988
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Bieber
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. W. Jeffrey;R. Pasewark;S. Bieber
使用 35 个变量和判别分析程序，发现在科罗拉多州提出精神错乱抗辩的 133 名男性被告中，87% 的人被正确分类为“判定精神错乱”和“定罪”处置组。与精神错乱裁决最正相关的是精神错乱的精神病学评估和精神分裂症的诊断。与精神错乱判决负相关的是药物滥用和人格障碍的诊断。
Using 35 variables and discriminant analysis procedures, it was found that, of 133 male defendants entering the insanity plea in Colorado, 87 percent were classified correctly into the disposition groups "adjudicated insane" and "convicted." Most positively related to an insanity adjudication were a psychiatric evaluation of insanity and a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Negatively related to the insanity verdict were diagnoses of substance use and personality disorders.