The assessment of trust orientation
The assessment of trust orientation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1207/s15327752jpa6702_7
复制
发表时间：
1996-10-01
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Jones, WH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Couch, LL;Adams, JM;Jones, WH
发展的信任清单，40项措施的信任在广义他人（广义信任）和浪漫的合作伙伴（合作伙伴信任）的描述。第三个概念的信任在朋友和家庭成员（网络信任）也进行了讨论。大学生（N = 1，229）参加了五个阶段的测试建设和验证。结果表明，信任库存规模是可靠的，无论是内部和时间，和合作伙伴的信任和广义的信任规模表现出并发和结构效度。由此产生的清单是独一无二的，它有能力同时评估这些类型的信任。支持网络信任的判别效度的证据是混合的，而因素分析处理的信任清单项目支持网络信任的独特性相比，合作伙伴和广义的信任，网络信任量表的相关性大致相同的程度，其他两个规模与几个变量的差异理论相关性。因此，很少有证据支持网络信任的增量有效性观察。讨论的重点是证据表明广义和合作伙伴的信任的解释的有效性，并认为有关网络信任的额外研究的问题。
The development of the Trust Inventory, a 40-item measure of trust in generalized others (Generalized Trust) and romantic partners (Partner Trust) is described. A third conceptualization of trust in friends and family members (Network Trust) is also discussed. College students (N = 1,229) participated in five stages of test construction and validation. Results indicated that the Trust Inventory scales are reliable, both internally and temporally, and that the Partner Trust and Generalized Trust Scales demonstrate both concurrent and construct validity. The resulting inventory is unique in its capacity to assess these types of trust simultaneously. Evidence supporting the discriminant validity of the Network Trust was mixed, whereas factor analytic treatments of Trust Inventory items supported the distinctiveness of Network Trust as compared to Partner and Generalized Trust, the Network Trust Scale correlated to roughly the same degree as the other two scales with several variables of differential theoretical relevance. Thus, little evidence supporting the incremental validity of Network Trust was observed. Discussion focuses on the evidence suggesting the validity of interpretations of Generalized and Partner Trust and considers the issue of additional research regarding Network Trust.