The Swedish version of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index.: Reliability and validity
The Swedish version of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index.: Reliability and validity
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/030097499750042272
复制
发表时间：
1999-01-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Stenström, CH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cronstedt, H;Waldner, A;Stenström, CH
本研究的目的是调查瑞典版巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数（BASFI）的可靠性和有效性。共113例患者采用BASFI、Bath强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数（BASDAI）、Bath强直性脊柱炎计量指数（BASMI）和Bath强直性脊柱炎患者总体评分（BAS-G）进行评估。24小时内两次BASFI评分的中位数分别为3.6和3.7（p>0.05）。患者发现BASFI项目相关。自我报告和物理治疗师观察的BASFI评分中位数分别为3.4和2.8（p>0.05）。BASFI和BASMI之间的相关系数r（s）=0.55，BASFI和BASDAI之间的相关系数r（s）=0.68，BASFI和BAS-G之间的相关系数r（s）=0.67。两种BASFI的训练前和训练后结果之间有显著改善（3.1 vs 2.0，p
The aim of the study was to investigate the reliability and the validity of the Swedish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). A total of 113 patients were assessed with the BASFI, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G). The median BASFI scores on two occasions within 24 hours were 3.6 versus 3.7 (p>0.05). The patients found the BASFI items relevant. The median self-reported and physiotherapist-observed BASFI scores were 3.4 and 2.8 respectively (p>0.05). The correlation coefficient between the BASFI and the BASMI was r(s),=0.55, between the BASFI and the BASDAI r(s)=0.68, and between the BASFI and the BAS-G r(s)=0.67. Significant improvements between the pre- and post-training results for both the BASFI(3.1 vs 2.0, p