The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City
The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City
复制标题
自由规则：自由主义与现代城市
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Joyce
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Joyce
19世纪国家和城市的自由治理依赖于“自由之治”。作为一种统治形式，它依赖于某些类型的公民和社会生活模式的生产，而这反过来又依赖于改变城市的物质形式（其布局，建筑，基础设施）及其领导人，公民和监护人居住和想象的方式。帕特里克·乔伊斯主要关注伦敦和曼彻斯特，但也参考了格拉斯哥、都柏林、巴黎、维也纳、殖民地印度，甚至当代的洛杉矶，创造性地发展了福柯式的史学方法，以反思现代自由社会的本质。他对地图和人口普查、下水道和市场、公共图书馆和公园等“人工制品”的思考，以及对公民政府和城市规划的思考，都与理论解释交织在一起，以考察现代生活基础设施中建立的非个人的、往往是无形的社会指导和控制形式，以及这些机制如何塑造文化和社会生活，并引起民众的抵制。
The liberal governance of the nineteenth-century state and city depended on the "rule of freedom". As a form of rule it relied on the production of certain kinds of citizens and patterns of social life, which in turn depended on transforming both the material form of the city (its layout, architecture, infrastructure) and the ways it was inhabited and imagined by its leaders, citizens and custodians. Focusing mainly on London and Manchester, but with reference also to Glasgow, Dublin, Paris, Vienna, colonial India, and even contemporary Los Angeles, Patrick Joyce creatively and originally develops Foucauldian approaches to historiography to reflect on the nature of modern liberal society. His consideration of such "artifacts" as maps and censuses, sewers and markets, public libraries and parks, and of civic governments and city planning, are intertwined with theoretical interpretations to examine both the impersonal, often invisible forms of social direction and control built into the infrastructure of modern life and the ways in which these mechanisms both shape culture and social life and engender popular resistance.