A comparison of some aspects of structured and unstructured psychiatric interviews.
A comparison of some aspects of structured and unstructured psychiatric interviews.
复制标题
结构化和非结构化精神病学访谈某些方面的比较。
DOI：
10.1176/ajp.128.2.180
复制
发表时间：
1971
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Saghir
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Saghir
作者提出了一个标准化的访谈工具和传统的自由风格的医学访谈，涉及两组采访者的比较结果。作者对他们的访谈行为、风格和重点的评分表明，标准化的工具在精神病理学的覆盖范围方面更为全面。另一方面，自由式访谈允许显著的个人差异的重点，这有助于观察员之间的差异，阻碍了不同研究人员的工作的可比性。
The author presents the results of a comparison between a standardized interviewing instrument and the traditional free-style medical interview that involved two groups of interviewers. The author's ratings of their conduct of the interviews, their styles, and their points of emphasis indicated that the standardized instrument was more comprehensive in its coverage of psychiatric pathology. On the other hand, the free-style interview allowed significant individual variation in emphasis, which contributes to differences among observers and impedes comparability of the work of different researchers.