Resilience to Loss and Potential Trauma

Resilience to Loss and Potential Trauma
复制标题

DOI:
10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104526
复制
发表时间:
2011-01-01
影响因子:
18.4
通讯作者:
Mancini, Anthony D.
Mancini, Anthony D.
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bonanno, George A.;Westphal, Maren;Mancini, Anthony D.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

损失和潜在的创伤性事件(PTE)的初步研究已占主导地位的精神病理学的方法强调个人功能障碍或事件的方法强调暴露和非暴露组之间的平均差异。我们认为这些方法的局限性,并回顾最近的研究,集中在异质性的结果后,令人厌恶的事件。使用传统的分析工具和复杂的潜在轨迹建模,这项研究已经确定了一套原型的结果模式。通常情况下,PTE后最常见的结果是健康功能或恢复力的稳定轨迹。我们回顾的研究表明,弹性不是几个主导因素的结果,而是有多个独立的预测弹性的结果。最后,我们批判性地评估了是否有约束力的建设干预措施,实际上可以使人们更有弹性的问题,我们关闭与未来的研究弹性的建议。
Initial research on loss and potentially traumatic events (PTEs) has been dominated by either a psychopathological approach emphasizing individual dysfunction or an event approach emphasizing average differences between exposed and nonexposed groups. We consider the limitations of these approaches and review more recent research that has focused on the heterogeneity of outcomes following aversive events. Using both traditional analytic tools and sophisticated latent trajectory modeling, this research has identified a set of prototypical outcome patterns. Typically, the most common outcome following PTEs is a stable trajectory of healthy functioning or resilience. We review research showing that resilience is not the result of a few dominant factors, but rather that there are multiple independent predictors of resilient outcomes. Finally, we critically evaluate the question of whether resilience-building interventions can actually make people more resilient, and we close with suggestions for future research on resilience.