Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions
Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0963662507077510
复制
发表时间：
2007-07-01
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Williamson, Suzanne
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Burgess, Jacquelin;Stirling, Andy;Williamson, Suzanne
本文讨论了协商绘图(DM)的方法论发展，DM是一种参与式、多标准、选项评估过程，它结合了使用定量决策分析技术的新方法和参与式审议领域的一些重大创新。DM是一个对称的过程，让“专家”和“公民”参与同一评估过程，提供框架的一致性、相互联系和审问，并提供大量面对面讨论的机会。通过一个器官移植选择的详细案例研究，本文讨论了DM中的步骤。分析表明，DM能够通过将分析和审议部分整合到一个透明、可审计的过程中来引出和记录共识判断以及不同的观点，这一过程为个人学习创造了许多机会，并为有争议的科学政策问题提供了强有力的决策支持工具。
This paper discusses the methodological development of Deliberative Mapping (DM), a participatory, multi-criteria, option appraisal process that combines a novel approach to the use of quantitative decision analysis techniques with some significant innovations in the field of participatory deliberation. DM is a symmetrical process, engaging "specialists" and "citizens" in the same appraisal process, providing for consistency of framing, mutual inter-linkage and interrogation, and substantial opportunities for face-to-face discussion. Through a detailed case study of organ transplantation options, the paper discusses the steps in DM. The analysis shows that DM is able to elicit and document consensual judgments as well as divergent views by integrating analytic and deliberative components in a transparent, auditable process that creates many opportunities for personal learning, and provides a robust decision-support tool for contested science-policy issues.