New pieces for the substance P puzzle.
New pieces for the substance P puzzle.
复制标题
P 物质拼图的新碎片。
DOI:
10.1016/j.pain.2013.04.020
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
7.4
通讯作者:
Linnman,Clas
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Linnman,Clas
In 1931, von Euler and Gaddum discovered a pharmacologically active substance in preparations of the horse gut and brain, later nicknamed Substance P (SP; for powder)[26]. Isolation of SP proved difficult and was not accomplished until 40 years later, in 1971, following a chance finding of a sialogogic factor in bovine hypothalamic extracts [20, 23]. SP is found in sensory C-fiber neurons, and following stimulation of nociceptive afferents, SP is released in the spinal cord. Naturally, SP has long been considered a ‘‘pain neuropeptide’’. It took another 20 years before the SP preferred receptor, Neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R) was identified and cloned [22] and the first non-peptide NK-1R antagonist drug was publically disclosed. Since 1991, several structurally diverse and highly selective NK-1R antagonists have been developed for clinical trials. In addition, some of these antagonists have been developed into Positron Emission Tomography (PET) ligands, which are primarily used to determine drug receptor occupancy, an essential guide for dose selection in clinical trials [4, 5]. Despite promising preclinical results, clinical studies did not find efficacy in a variety of chronic pain states, including painful diabetic neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia, migraine (acute and preventive), visceral pain, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia [6, 11]. Brain penetration and target engagement by candidate drugs were confirmed with PET, which ruled out the possibility that the lack of clinical efficacy of NK-1R antagonists in pain modulation was due to inadequate blocking of receptors [7, 10]. Moreover, pharmacological functional MRI of aprepitant, an NK-1R antagonist, demonstrated no significant modulation of pain network connectivity or reactivity [24]. Accordingly, major pharma largely abandoned their Substance P pain programs. To date, aprepitant and the prodrug fosaprepitant are the only FDA approved NK-1R antagonists and these are indicated for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and for postoperative nausea and vomiting. The silver lining is that the heavy investments in NK-1R drug development gave us valuable tools to evaluate the NK-1R system. The PET ligands [18F] SPA-RQ and [11C] GR205171 have high affinity and slow dissociation from the NK-1R, suggesting that they are good agents for assessment of receptor levels [3]. In this issue of PAIN, Jarcho et al.[12] used this property to measure NK-1R levels in two clinical populations: patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The patient groups (and healthy controls) were well characterized, allowing for some very interesting comparisons. The authors found that NK-1R availability is decreased in both conditions, particularly pronounced in patients with IBD, and that the reductions appear concentrated in the anterior cingulate and the basal ganglia. Moreover, NK-1R availability correlated with GI symptoms in IBD patients, and with duration of illness and pain sensitivity in IBS patients. Thus, the relationship between NK-1R and the manifestation of illness may differ between patient groups. These findings are consistent with our studies on patients with whiplash associated disorder (WAD grade II), in which patients also displayed a reduction of NK-1R availability in the anterior cingulate.[17]. In WAD, the reductions were however most pronounced in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and the magnitude of reduction related to fear of movement. Thus, it appears that multiple forms of chronic pain may lead to reduced NK-1R availability in cortical and subcortical regions. Further studies are needed to confirm how NK-1R levels relate to clinical symptoms …