Text Analysis Software: Commonalities, Differences and Limitations: The Results of a Review
Text Analysis Software: Commonalities, Differences and Limitations: The Results of a Review
复制标题
文本分析软件：共同点、差异和局限性：审查结果
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Cornelia Zuell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Alexa;Cornelia Zuell
在本文中，我们讨论了文本分析软件的功能和技术的趋势，并反映了那些需要进一步开发的领域。讨论的基础是对15种目前可用的文本分析软件（Alexa和Zuell，1999）的全面回顾。本文对AQUAD、ATLAS.ti、CoAn、Code-A-Text、DICTION、DIMAP-MCCA、HyperRESEARCH、KEDS、NUD*IST、QED、TATOE、TEXTPACK、TextSmart、WinMAXpro和WordStat等软件包进行了详细的介绍。在这里，我们只描述了选择要审查的程序的方法和标准，并集中讨论所选程序提供的支持类型、其功能的共性和差异，指出它们的一些缺点并提出未来发展的建议。
In this paper we discuss the tendencies infunctionality and technology of software for textanalysis and reflect on those areas where moredevelopment is needed. The basis for this discussionforms a comprehensive review of fifteen currentlyavailable software for text analysis (Alexa and Zuell,1999). In the review the following software packageswere individually presented in a detailed andextensive manner: AQUAD, ATLAS.ti, CoAn, Code-A-Text,DICTION, DIMAP-MCCA, HyperRESEARCH, KEDS,NUD*IST, QED, TATOE, TEXTPACK, TextSmart,WinMAXpro, and WordStat. Here we only delineate ourmethodology and criteria for selecting which programsto review and concentrate on discussing the types ofsupport the selected programs offer, the commonalitiesand differences of their functionality, point to someof their shortcomings and put forward suggestions forfuture development.