Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: allocators versus recipients.
Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: allocators versus recipients.
复制标题
资源分配问题中的自身利益和公平：分配者与接受者。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.1061
复制
发表时间：
1997
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Bazerman,MH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Diekmann,KA;Samuels,SM;Ross,L;Bazerman,MH
有两项研究探讨了在资源分配问题上自利与平等规范之间的紧张关系。研究1为商科研究生提供了一项假设任务，要求他们做出一系列管理决策。在了解这些决策的结果后，他们被要求在自己和竞争对手经理之间分配奖金池（后者选择了非常不同的决策，并且在两个标准上取得了与自己相同的结果，或者在一个标准上取得了更好的结果，而在另一个标准上取得了更差的结果）。研究2要求斯坦福大学和圣何塞州立大学的本科生考虑在他们两所学校的候选人之间分配一个假设的奖学金基金。这两项研究的数据对比明显的公平和缺乏自我利益的分配者与评价者的自私的反应。此外，当面对不同的要求，参与者倾向于证明不平等的资源分配，只要他们或他们的团体的代表，收到更大的份额，很少有人会建议，要求，或强加。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Two studies explored the tension between self-interest and the equality norm in problems of resource allocation. Study 1 presented graduate business students with a hypothetical task requiring them to make a series of managerial decisions. On learning the outcome of those decisions, they were asked to divide a bonus pool between self and a rival manager (who had opted for very different decisions and achieved either the same results as self on 2 criteria or a better result on 1 criterion and a worse result on the other criterion). Study 2 required Stanford and San Jose State undergraduates to consider the division of a hypothetical scholarship fund between candidates from their 2 schools. Data from both studies contrasted the apparent evenhandedness and lack of self-interest manifested by allocators with the self-serving responses of evaluators. Furthermore, when faced with different claims, participants were inclined to justify an unequal allocation of resources—provided that they, or a representative of their group, received the larger share—that few personally would have recommended, demanded, or imposed.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)