Identifying victims of peer aggression from early to middle childhood: Analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims
Identifying victims of peer aggression from early to middle childhood: Analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//1040-3590.14.1.74
复制
发表时间：
2002-03-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ladd, GW;Kochenderfer-Ladd, B
进行了两项研究，以调查儿童同伴受害的交叉告密者测量。研究一比较了197名幼儿园儿童(年龄为-5.73岁)至四年级的受害自我报告和同伴报告。在二年级之前，同伴报告不如自我报告可靠，也不能很好地估计关系适应。在研究2中，比较了392名2年级儿童(年龄为8.73岁)到4年级的单一信息者和多信息者(自我、同伴、教师、家长)受害程度。结果表明：(A)来自四个信息者的数据是可靠的，并且随着时间的推移越来越一致，(B)没有单一信息者被证明是关系适应的最佳预测因素，以及(C)多信息者综合测量比任何单一信息者测量都能更好地估计关系适应。
Two studies were conducted to investigate cross-informant measures of children's peer victimization. In Study 1, self- and peer reports of victimization were compared for 197 children from Kindergarten W age = -5.73) to Grade 4. Before Grade 2. peer reports were less reliable than self-reports and were poor estimators of relational adjustment. In Study 2, single- versus multiple-informant (self, peer, teacher, parent) victimization measures were compared for 392 children across grades 2 W age = 8.73) to 4. Results indicated that (a) data from the four informants were reliable and increasingly concordant over time, (b) no single-informant measure proved to be the best predictor of relational adjustment, and (c) a multi-informant composite measure yielded better estimates of relational adjustment than any single-informant measure.