A useful dialogue? Habermas and International Relations
A useful dialogue? Habermas and International Relations
复制标题
有用的对话？
DOI：
10.1017/s0260210505006339
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Jill Steans
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Diez;Jill Steans
自尤尔根·哈贝马斯的著作首次在国际关系理论中被提及以来，至今已有20多年。沿着其他许多欧陆哲学家和社会理论家，哈贝马斯最初是在国际关系理论中对实证主义，特别是新现实主义的批判中被动员起来的。因此，对哈贝马斯和国际关系的兴趣必须首先放在第四次辩论的背景下。本评论的论坛部分为我们提供了一个机会，以评估和询问是否哈贝马斯和国际关系之间的对话，迄今为止，在提供新的概念和方法论工具，以分析国际政治和启发新的研究议程在国际关系中是有用的。我们还问是否对话的作用，在哈贝马斯的工作中发挥了有用的制定国际关系的批判理论。
It is now more than twenty years since Jürgen Habermas's work was first referred to in International Relations (IR) theory. Along with many other continental philosophers and social theorists, Habermas was initially mobilised in the critique of positivism, and in particular neorealism, in IR theory. As such, the interest in Habermas and IR must be located in the first instance within the context of the fourth debate. This Forum section of the Review provides us with the opportunity to take stock and ask whether the dialogue between Habermas and IR has, thus far, been useful in providing new conceptual and methodological tools to analyse international politics and in inspiring new research agendas in IR. We also ask whether the role that dialogue plays within Habermas's work has been useful in formulating a critical theory of international relations.