Bias in spatial location due to categorization: Comment on Tversky and Schiano
Bias in spatial location due to categorization: Comment on Tversky and Schiano
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.96
复制
发表时间：
1996-03-01
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Huttenlocher, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Engebretson, PH;Huttenlocher, J
B。Tversky和D. J. Schiano（1989）报道了在“ell "框架中再现直线角度的偏差。当没有给出对任务的概念性解释时，他们认为这种偏见是由于知觉过程造成的，这种知觉过程在线条上产生了明显的倾斜。J. Schiano gr B. Tversky，1992）。我们建议J.Huttenlocher，L. V. Hedges，和S.邓肯（1991）的模型的类别效应的估计刺激值提供了一个更好的解释这种偏见。两个实验，研究这些不同的观点。结果表明，框架的方向和干扰任务的偏见，更符合J. Huttenlocher等人。的模型比D. J. Schiano和B.特沃斯基
B. Tversky and D. J. Schiano (1989) reported bias in reproducing the angle of a line in an ''ell'' frame. When no conceptual interpretation of the task was given, they argued that the bias was due to a perceptual process that produced an apparent tilt in the line (D. J. Schiano gr B. Tversky, 1992). We propose that J. Huttenlocher, L. V. Hedges, and S. Duncan's (1991) model of category effects on estimates of stimulus values provides a better explanation of this bias. Two experiments are presented that examine these alternative views. The results show effects of the orientation of the frame and of an interference task on bias that are more consistent with J. Huttenlocher et al.'s model than with the perceptual explanation adopted by D. J. Schiano and B. Tversky.