The Cognitive Processes in Informal Reasoning
The Cognitive Processes in Informal Reasoning
复制标题
非正式推理中的认知过程
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
V. Shaw
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
V. Shaw
两个实验调查了人们在评价报纸和杂志社论中的非正式论点时所考虑的因素。实验1表明，受试者更有可能反对论点的前提和结论的真实性，而不是它们之间联系的强度。实验1还揭示了两种操作，帮助受试者反对前提和结论之间的联系：评级如何以及前提支持的结论和评级的前提和结论的可信度。实验2进一步表明，识别论点的前提和结论的受试者更善于对前提和结论之间的联系提出异议。此外，实验2中的受试者在对前提和结论的真实性提出异议时，比对前提和结论之间的联系提出异议时更好、更快。结果进行了讨论的限制，他们提出的发展认知理论的信息…
Two experiments investigated the factors that people consider when evaluating informal arguments in newspaper and magazine editorials. Experiment 1 showed that subjects were more likely to object to the truth of the premises and the conclusions of an argument than to the strength of the link between them. Experiment 1 also revealed two manipulations that helped subjects object to the link between premises and conclusions: rating how well the premises support the conclusions and rating the believability of the premises and conclusions. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that subjects who identified the premises and conclusions of an argument were better at formulating objections to the link between premises and conclusions. Moreover, subjects in Experiment 2 were better and faster at formulating objections to the truth of the premises and conclusions than to the link between premises and conclusions. The results are discussed in terms of the constraints they pose for developing a cognitive theory of informa...