On the validity of first-order prediction limits for conceptual hydrologic models
On the validity of first-order prediction limits for conceptual hydrologic models
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/0022-1694(88)90136-9
复制
发表时间:
1988-11
影响因子:
6.4
通讯作者:
G. Kuczera
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Kuczera
First-order analysis is a powerful method for evaluating the effect of parameter uncertainty propagating through a conceptual hydrologic model. However, its validity rests on the strong assumption that a first-order approximation is valid over the region of parameter space where there is significant parameter uncertainty. It is suggested that Beale's nonlinearity measure be used to check this assumption. This measure is based on the discrepancy between actual and linearized response for parameters randomly sampled from the surface of the 90% confidence ellipsoid. Examples involving two nonlinear conceptual models demonstrate that model nonlinearity is very much application-dependent, highlighting the need to compute Beale's nonlinearity measure in all model applications. Uncertainty in hydrologic response is induced not only by parameter uncertainty propagating through the model, but also by natural uncertainty arising from model and measurement error. Approximate prediction limits based on both parameter and natural uncertainty, are developed in a regression context, which employs an error model consistent with the residual characteristics found in conceptual hydrologic model applications. An example involving an eight-parameter streamflow yield model demonstrates dominance of natural over parameter uncertainty, emphasizing the need to include both forms of uncertainty when computing prediction limits.