Comparative studies of microtubule mechanics with two competing models suggest functional roles of alternative tubulin lateral interactions.
Comparative studies of microtubule mechanics with two competing models suggest functional roles of alternative tubulin lateral interactions.
复制标题
微管力学与两种竞争模型的比较研究表明替代微管蛋白横向相互作用的功能作用。
DOI:
10.1016/j.bpj.2012.05.003
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Xing,Jianhua
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wu,Zhanghan;Nogales,Eva;Xing,Jianhua
The dynamic assembly and disassembly of microtubules and the mechanical properties of these polymers are essential for many key cellular processes. Mathematical and computational modeling, especially coupled mechanochemical modeling, has contributed significantly to our understanding of microtubule dynamics. However, critical discrepancies exist between experimental observations and modeling results that need to be resolved before further progress toward a complete model can be made. Open sheet structures ranging in length from several hundred nanometers to one micron have often been observed at the growing ends of microtubules in in vitro studies. Existing modeling studies predict these sheet structures to be short and rare intermediates of microtubule disassembly rather than important components of the assembly process. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies also reveal interesting step-like gaps of the force-indentation curve that cannot yet be explained by existing theoretical models. We have carried out computational studies to compare the mechanical properties of two alternative models: a more conventional model where tubulin dimers are added directly into a microtubule lattice, and one that considers an additional type of tubulin lateral interaction proposed to exist in intermediate sheet structures during the microtubule assembly process. The first model involves a single type of lateral interactions between tubulin subunits, whereas the latter considers a second type that can convert to the canonical lateral contact during microtubule closure into a cylinder. Our analysis shows that only the second model can reproduce the AFM results over a broad parameter range. We propose additional studies using different sizes of AFM tips that would allow to unambiguously distinguish the relative validity of the two models.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
J. Kurz;Robley C. Williams
通讯作者:
J. Kurz;Robley C. Williams
影响因子:
4
作者:
Simon,JR;Salmon,ED
通讯作者:
Salmon,ED
影响因子:
1.5
作者:
Chrétien, D;Jánosi, I;Flyvbjerg, H
通讯作者:
Flyvbjerg, H
DOI:
10.1083/jcb.84.1.141
发表时间:
1980-01
期刊:
The Journal of cell biology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Bergen LG;Borisy GG
通讯作者:
Borisy GG
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1997
期刊:
Brain Research. Molecular Brain Research
影响因子:
--
作者:
T. Tukamoto;N. Nukina;K. Ide;I. Kanazawa
通讯作者:
I. Kanazawa