"Deliberative Democracy and the Japanese Saiban-in (Lay Judge) Trial System"
"Deliberative Democracy and the Japanese Saiban-in (Lay Judge) Trial System"
复制标题
《协商民主与日本裁判院审判制度》
DOI：
10.1017/als.2016.52
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
Noboru Yanase
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
柳瀬昇;柳瀬昇;柳瀬昇;柳瀬昇;Noboru Yanase;柳瀬昇;Noboru Yanase;柳瀬昇;柳瀬昇;Noboru Yanase
自2009年5月以来，日本实施了被称为“saiban-in seido”（非专业法官审判制度）的公众参与刑事司法制度。本文的目的在于分析最高法院制度的立法过程，并从协商民主的角度对该制度进行评价。本文的结论是，与那些希望引入一种由非专业陪审员主导的更纯粹的陪审团审判形式的批评相反，应该从协商民主的角度积极看待目前的三名专业法官与六名陪审员混合的陪审团制度。
Since May 2009, public participation in the criminal justice system, known as saiban-in seido (trial system by lay judges), has been implemented in Japan. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the law-making process of the saiban-in system and present an evaluation of the system from the perspective of deliberative democracy. This paper concludes that, contrary to criticism from those who want to introduce a purer form of jury trial dominated by lay jurors, the current saiban-in system, which mixes three professional judges with six saiban-ins, should be viewed positively from the perspective of deliberative democracy.